Sanity is madness put to good use. – George Santayana

Do you remember when patients came first? This picture was taken in New Orleans at Marine Hospital in 1942. Back then a hospital administrator looking at this picture would have seen a patient, a doctor, and a nurse. The administrator would have acknowledged the importance of each person, but he or she would have viewed the patient as the most important person in the room. This picture depicts teamwork and patient centered care at its best.
Fast forward to 2012, the year of hospital budget cuts and the bottom line. Today, a hospital administrator looking at this picture would see a revenue earner, a cost, and a RGU. That stands for revenue generating unit. The doctor is the revenue earner. He performs procedures and brings in money for the hospital. The nurse is the cost. The hospital has to pay her even though she can’t bring in money like a doctor can, therefore she is viewed as a liability to the hospital. Then there is the RGU. Sadly, that’s the patient. Hospitals love patients with superior healthcare coverage. Unscrupulous doctors and hospitals will perform expensive procedures on lucrative RGUs, and keep them in the hospital as long as possible for the sake of the institution’s bottom line.
I wrote about how the Amanda Trujillo situation impacts nurses in my last post. Now I want to focus on how it affects patients. We are all patients. All patients are human beings who deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. Banner Health lost a huge revenue stream when Amanda saw a knowledge deficit and educated her patient about other treatment options. Banner Health’s administrator looked at the picture and saw a tyrannical money making doctor screaming for Amanda’s job and license, a nurse, or should I say a liability that upset the financial apple cart, and the patient who was now a less valuable RGU. The picture was clear. Banner Health opted to eliminate the liability to pacify their revenue-making physician, and attempted to make the RGU more valuable by refusing the patient access to hospice. Banner Health’s behavior toward the patient is unconscionable. As a patient, I want hospitals to provide care that is in my best interest, not motivated by financial gain.
I’m afraid that what happened at Banner Health is just the beginning of a frightening trend. Patient care is going to become more profit driven as more people become uninsured and as states slash Medicaid reimbursement. No patient should be ushered into the most expensive treatment option for the sake of the all mighty dollar. And no nurse should be fired for protecting his or her patient from unethical practices. The Amanda Trujillo case is about all of us. Patients are not RGUs. It’s time to put hospitals like Banner Health in check.
Carol Gino
January 29th, 2012 at 5:49 pm
Yes, you’re absolutely right. Nurses are the last bastion of Patient Choice against the big business of Healthcare. If we fall, or allow ourselves to be knocked down, or be forced to remain silent, we all fall. Telling a patient what to expect, being there so they can voice their concerns, offering them comfort and therefore choice is within the purview of our practice. We all know that it’s time. So we have to join together, show up, stand up and speak up for Nursing. If not now, when?
- Different Types of Nursing Careers
January 29th, 2012 at 6:44 pm
[...] Note to Banner Health: Patients are not RGUs [...]
Tammy Swofford
January 30th, 2012 at 9:14 am
This is no different than the oncologist in our region who owns a home health company (does the phrase conflict of interest come to mind?). A friend of mine is an R.N. When her father had brain cancer, the doctor wanted him placed on home health. She did a little checking, found he owned the thing, and also that the reports were that the care was insufficient. She refused the agency, and he refused to treat her father anymore pompously declaring she had broken the doctor-client relationship.
We need to do a better job of recognizing signs of liability and monetary-driven care when it comes to our families.
Tammy
Cathy Lane RPh
February 4th, 2012 at 12:03 am
And, while we’re at it, fleshing out the details, let’s also consider that it is the administrators of insurance companies, not medical doctors, that are often making decisions affecting treatment or to not treat (whether a specific therapeutic option is ‘covered’ not, whether to use it if available), whether patients have access to insurance-covered treatments, and whether the corporate institution can pay the health-care PROVIDERS.
As unfortunate as the situation, surgeons particularly are known to get on their high horse. That as an aside, the issue is well to be considered by pharmacists who’ve been consigned to their posts often as factory workers, linked by administrative middle-management issues as medicine is practiced by the methods for how ALL PROVIDERS are reimbursed.
Shahina Lakhani MSN RN
February 21st, 2012 at 10:11 am
Hey Mother Jones, this is a beautifully written articles and hits the nail right on the head when it comes to acute care. Since I have also worked as a hospice nurse, I was surprised to see the results when table are turned and I want to share my experience here to drive home a very important point. In hospice, medicare states that companies will be paid only if the patient gets the required number of visits by an RN. Yes, not by an MD (who, until recently, were not even required to make visits at all) but an RN. So now the RNs become the revenue generating, lead care providers and case managers. We become the face of the company and the care provided. People choose a hospice agency based on the promises by the marketers about the excellence of care, number of RN visits and the care by support staff such as CNAs, SWs and Chaplains. The medications and tests ordered by a physician are based on an RN’s assessment. Her recommendations are also a key factor in deciding not only the medications a patient receives but also the number of visits by CNAs, therapies approved etc. We can also ask the SWs and Chaplians for more frequent visits if needed. It sounds like a very empowered role especially because we not only manage all aspect of care but are also the revenue generators. You’d think that in this scenario, nurses would be treated fairly and would reap the benefits of their hard work in better work conditions and more pay. Unfortunately, the opposite is true. A lot of hospices, including one of the biggest in USA (I worked for them for a few months), take this revenue generating power of the RNs to manage them like work horses. The more patients they see the more money for the company! This brings me to a very important point. I believe, the current condition of the nurses and the nursing profession is because of a lot of factors including the fact that we have never stood together as a profession to speak up for our own rights. Because we have not been united we have been an easy target for exploitation. A clear example is how Amanda Trujillo’s case has been given a silent treatment by a lot of nursing organizations and how AZBON has handled it. We got a response from ANA only recently because of the pressure of nurses beginning to rally together. Unfortunately, the oppressors in nursing are not just the outsiders but also a lot of fellow nurses in leadership positions. If we really want to change the work conditions for nurses, if we really want to be recognized as partners in healthcare, it behooves us to rally together now. Organize events, draft proposals and do everything necessary. We do not need even a single politician behind us. Our sheer numbers and our unity is enough for everyone to take notice. And, once they take notice, we will have to be very alert to make sure that no agreement is reached unless it is exactly what our profession needs and deserves. The question is are we ready and committed to rise up to the challenge?
Carol Gino
February 21st, 2012 at 12:02 pm
I believe Shahina is right on and so I work up dreaming about developing some power strategies that could work for all of us. The first question I have to ask is “Are our professional organizations as disempowered as we are in the current corporate system?” Do they have to grow into their full power as policy makers? I’m going to write a piece on my blog today (hoping to clarify all of it, because I think better when I write!) but I do think that unless those who are leading the profession occasionally visit the “troops” in the field so they can get a real idea of what’s happening, we may have to develop a new advocacy group. In the meantime, I do think we should employ the policy makers we have in place and just make them aware that unless they grow, the profession can’t ANA and I can’t print out a code of ethics without paying another 15.00 after the 183.00 I’ve already paid, and I still don’t know (because it’s couched in legalese what they can do for ME!) Unifying also implies we will give the organizations a chance as well. I know lots of people have been let down by them but I think we should give it one more shot…Could it be they’re just out of touch…or are they really out of line.
Why Nurses Are Where They Are: Amanda Trujillo’s Story, The Reason For High Burnout Among Nurses, And What Each Individual Nurse Can Do To Change That
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:18 am
[...] article is inspired by one of Mother Jones' beautifully written article. In the article she explains that since doctors are revenue generators they have much [...]
Arizona’s attack on nurses: the Amanda Trujillo case goes viral - Three Sonorans
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:45 pm
[...] Note to Banner Health: Patients are Not RGUs [...]
Nurseup.com, A Nursing Advocacy Organization | Nurse Up!
March 24th, 2012 at 1:29 am
[...] Note to Banner Health: Patients are Not RGUs [...]
suki
April 3rd, 2012 at 2:04 pm
http://youtu.be/kIcQ2JfUUck
What is going on in healthcare today? I find it downright scary for the patients. The one person that is there to protect and advocate for them is being hung out to dry. Why is that? I know why. Because that person (nurses) speak up for the patient. Administrators don’t like that. It messes with their bottom line. That lines their pockets.